Síle na gCíogh
Conundrums in Stone
SATAN IN THE GROIN
from The Seduction of Morality by Tom Murphy (1994) , one of a succession of novels and plays written since Irish independence about Irish poverty, economic and spiritual:
"She withdrew her arm and then took her hand upwards to stroke the curve of her belly, then downwards again, through the hair, turned the fingers in between her legs to find the it of the girl, the what, the quem, gee, the job, the word that offended her, the font, the nothing, the everything, the hole, to find it wet. Good. When fishes flew and forests walked and whatever the rest of it is."
["the rest of it" is contained in G.K. Chesterton's poem The Donkey. The underlining is mine and indicates the correct modern pronunciation and meaning of 'gig'.]
The bloody, war-torn twelfth century was economic and artistic boom-time for Europe, despite the pillage of warring princes who devastated huge areas where rape, mass-murder and starvation stalked the land. At the same time the monastic movement underwent spectacular expansion, making the Romanesque the greatest art movement in history. A large part of the expanding wealth of the monasteries derived from their control in the 11th century of the main routes which criss-crossed Europe: the many Pilgrimage roads to Rome, Jerusalem and Santiago de Compostela. There was also the important factor of a century or two of global warming which allowed a great increase in general cultivation - and grape vines to flourish even in Ireland - before the "mini-Ice Age" arrived in the 14th century, bringing The Black Death in its train.
The rise of the monasteries itself came with the great sigh of relief that Armageddon had not come on the year 1000 A.D. (though of course Homo sapiens is itself Armageddon extinguishing the rest of the natural world). This was followed by the rise of the papacy under Urban II, and his genocidal proclamation of the terrible First Crusade, which attracted all the most vicious and racist people in Western Europe, and set thrm on their way pillaging and burning all the way to a blood-bath in multi-cultural Jerusalem, followed by the establishment of (relatively tolerant) principalities in Palestine. The beginning of a nine-hundred-year war against (and, latterly, humiliation of) Islam, went with the promulgation of the celibacy of the clergy in the Western (Catholic) church, mainly to distinguish it from both the Eastern church and Islam.
At a time when armies, and some individuals - including stonemasons - travelled huge distances by foot or horseback (Eleanor of Aquitaine covered thousands of miles every years with or without her husband Henry II of England, Ireland and Anjou), the Pilgrimage to Santiago became the greatest 'tourist' industry ever. The pilgrimages to Compostela and Jerusalem were symbolic of the pilgrim's progress through life to the Eternal City. They were undertaken mainly to attain merit or to expiate sin: even eating fat meat during lent could be sufficient reason to go (or be directed to go) to Santiago as penitence.
In our own times the autobahns of Germany have produced the Autobahnkirche (Catholic and Lutheran), open at all times to service the 'spiritual requirements' of fraught travellers. These pit-stops for the pious and frazzled are pale and sad imitations of the churches which lined the routes to Rome and, especially, Santiago. Catering for poor pedestrians as well as the rich on horseback or in carriages, they were, of course, far more frequent than the service-stops on modern motorways.
This servicing of the Pilgrim Roads from the Baltic and the Hungarian Plain to Atlantic Spain brought - and distributed - riches throughout Europe: wealth and the means to move it unknown since Roman times. This wealth, of course, attracted all sorts of unwelcome attachments, such as entertainers, jongleurs and whores, pedlars of all kinds, and people displaying deformities or strange animals. Even now, in France, the last survivors of a disgusting tradition of exhibiting doped piglets and kids in cages for children to stroke, attract no opprobrium from a population brought up to regard animals as stupid machines.
It also created many thousands of craftsmen, including stonemasons and sculptors. The latter could not have failed to observe that the richer people become, the meaner they generally get: to become rich you often have to be mean in all senses of the word. Where money was newest, during the land-grab of the Reconquista in Spain, it seems that the arriviste nouveaux-riches often cheated or short-changed those who built the churches that they endowed, for very many churches there show signs of incompletion, with scaffolding holes not filled in.
But boom ensured the slow economic demise of the monasteries, due to the rise of the cities which used money, and the new monarchies which they serviced. The monasteries used almost no cash, the economy being largely one of deferred payment by goods, services, labour and agricultural produce. However, the economy that they stimulated was a cash economy based on import (mainly spices and other luxuries from the East) and export (such as wool and textiles from Yorkshire, Northern France and modern Belgium). The centres of power shifted from the great abbeys to towns which were centres of pilgrimage in themselves - Limoges, Tours, for example, and towns which were natural hubs of trade and intellect - Poitiers (with its mythical Courts of Love and six Romanesque churches), Toulouse, Paris, Laon, Bologna, Salamanca, Pisa, London and Oxford. The monastic dislike of money and resentment of the rising rich new towns with their luxuried class and their squalid underclass, fed into the iconography of sin, notably in depictions of Wealth (avaritia) - even on large urban churches such as Sainte-Croix in Bordeaux. A very fine example of a rich man or moneylender tortured by hellish monsters can be seen on an interior capital at Lucheux (Somme). (For more on monsters click here.)
And how well-founded their fear of money turned out to be. Luxury largely depends on usury (moneylending). Because usury remained a criminal sin (forbidden also to Muslims), the lending economy (necessary for most enterprises beyond monastery lands) was initially forced upon the Jews, who were then reviled for this as well as for being 'Christ-killers'. The business quickly passed to professional bankers (mostly from Lombardy) - while the Church itself sold not just benefices to the second sons of counts, princes and merchants, but pardons and indulgences to the masses. This, of course, eventually formed the basis of anti-Christian capitalism - and sowed the seeds of the Reformation which encouraged it.
Wealthy man or money-changer with moneybag, Rots (Calvados)
As power slipped away from the Benedictines and Cistercians to the fat clergy of the new cathedrals based in in the burgeoning towns - and the powerful order of Dominicans who used their control of the Holy Inquisition as an instrument of terror, Europe descended into what we now think of as mediæval superstition, often (and still) obsessed with blood. All sorts of horrors erupted out of Christianity - notably the 'Blood Libel' invented by the clergy of Norwich cathedral in order to acquire a prestigious and lucrative boy-saint at the expense of the 'Christ-killers'. The Blood Libel - the cleverly-insane calumny that Jews used the blood of (usually crucified) boys to make Passover matsos - spread all over Europe. The last official case, in Kiev in 1911, was instigated by an extreme monarchist group and, despite nobbling of the judge and jury by the Tsarist authorities, set free the Jewish scapegoat who soon afterwards emigrated to America. In America today the Blood Libel is still promulgated by video, and latterly, of course, Arabs (notably the Defence Minister of Syria) have started to re-invigorate the story.
The Crusades linked Christian 'spirituality' to violence and ethnocide: the church militant was born - and in no time created the Inquisition. (It took Islam nearly a thousand years to descend to the same level and attempt a payback.) With the decline of the non-urban monasteries and the accompanying rise of Gothic cathedrals centered in the cities, came a complete change in the art and the iconography echoing the change in outlook or Zeitgeist. The whole richly meaningful, and complex and sometimes earthy iconographic repertoire of the Romanesque became old-fashioned like the churches. The Romanesque was very firmly and sanely installed between Heaven and Hell, whereas the unhinged Gothic attempted to float to Heaven on its pinnacles and spires and Inquisitional unreason, despising the earthy, folksy, grounded qualities of the Romanesque. As a result, it served the illiterate badly, driving them to superstition.
Towards the end of the twelfth century a crucial shift in the Western European (but not Eastern Orthodox) perspective on the crucifixion occurred. Whereas from early Roman Christian times Jesus was portrayed as standing triumphant (like a latter-day Apollo) on his cross, conquering death, by the 13th century Jesus was shown in gruesome suffering, hanging from the cross in agony. This might have had something to do with the rise of the mendicant orders, and of the new cult of the Blessed Virgin Mary introduced by St Bernard of Clairvaux and the Cistercians. The triumph over death's dark dominion was no longer due directly to the single event of the crucifixion, but, instead, to the agony and suffering of the crucifixion. Suffering in itself became meritorious, as Western Europe became richer - and more war-torn.
Romanesque sculpture features remarkably few Biblical themes. Adam and Eve (almost always with their 'private parts' covered by hands or fig-leaf) are common on capitals; Daniel and the Lions a little less so, but in greater and marvellous variety. Occasionally there are Noah and his Ark, Tobias (carrying the huge fish) from the obscure book of Tobit, and, from the New Testament, Lazarus and his dog under the Rich Man's table. Most Romanesque sculpture is moralistic (e.g. the Psychomachia or War between the Virtues and Vices), or minatory: 'these things you may not do if you wish to escape damnation'. Many of the latter type occur on corbels, though in some places they were deemed important enough to be placed on doorways and interior capitals.
Doorways very often illustrated also the punishment of sin in Hell, often symbolically as a person being swallowed by a lion or monster: the jaws of Hell. Illustrations of Luxuria almost always show the punishment thought to be meted out eternally to those living 'La Dolce Vita': snakes, toads or even tortoises forever suckling/biting their desiccated dugs, or entering/emerging from their vulvas.
St Bernard famously protested (around 1125) about the fabulous monsters and other frippery which diverted the attention of the (illiterate) people from their imminent damnation. Indeed, he said, "there is seen everywhere such a arvellous diversity of forms that people read with greater pleasure what is carved in stone than what is written in books, and would rather gaze all day upon these singular creations than to meditate upon the Divine Word." Then he reveals himself as the mean cleric he was by adding: "O God! if one is not ashamed of the childishness of these carvings, why does not one spare the expense ?" And expensive they could be. The façade of Notre-Dame-La-Grande in Poitiers could not be carved today for less than tens of millions of pounds sterling.
One of the greatest banes of the Church in the Middle Ages was the Fairs - always drunken, riotous - often murderous - attended by conmen and pickpockets - hence the French expression : S'entendre comme larrons en foire (to be as thick as thieves at a fair).
Figurative Romanesque corbels for the most part represented two groups of subjects: beasts and monsters; and images of sinners mostly on the margins of society, including entertainers: jongleurs, acrobats, tumblers, buffoons, performing animals, contortionists, mummers, ventriloquists, 'freaks', exhibitionists, 'musical' farters, and, of course, musicians.
Le Puch (Gironde) : Performing Bear and musician-tumblers.
Bewhiskered shawm-player, Cénac (Dordogne)
But in the thirteenth centurycorbel-tables disappeared from outside the churches (where most social and economic activity took place) or moved inside, making them less visible. At the same time, the images of entertainers became stereotyped as well as much less frequent. In addition, the virtual disappearance of Romanesque images of monstrous creatures points perhaps to an urban society that was more smug and less imaginative. The symbolism and meaning attached to corbels degenerated into mere grotesquerie, and was largely banished to barely-visible roof-bosses and gargoyles, and to amusing misericords approachable only by the élite.
With the rising of lofty cathedrals which expressed the worldly power of the Church, religious art in Europe began a terminal decline into the sickening sentimentality of Christian Realism which continues to this day in its obsession with crucifixion, martyrdom, saintly masochism, and hysteric or ascetic hallucination.
There seems to be an innate human tendency to revere if not worship images, and the monotheisms have fought a losing battle against this wired-in weakness (which no non-humans have) - as against other evolutionary errors. Perhaps the difference between the Romanesque and the Gothic (with its roof-bosses and misericords and gargoyles), as between the Sermons in Stone and the Petrified Hags is illuminated by the following quotation from Mircea Eliade's book on hermaphroditism, The Two and the One:
metaphysical significance of symbols is lost,
Rathcline Church (Longford) photographed by Gabriel Cannon.
With the rise of the Papacy from its lowest point in the 10th century, and the rise of the Gothic cathedrals, came the anti-Christian obsession with money. The corruption and venality that the Benedictines, Augustinians and Cistercians abominated turned into an industry - in fact a new economic engine. The monasteries had created wealth through bringing marginal land into productive cultivation - and reducing the forests of France, Italy, Northern Spain and England by nearly a third. They had established safe trade-routes along the Pilgrim Roads, so that the towns could create wealth through import and export.
The difference between the world-views of the 12th and 13th centuries can hardly be exaggerated. It is something like the difference of German experience between the Weimar Republic and the rise of Hitler. Or, perhaps, from another point of view, like the difference between Hungary in the 1980s and in the 1990s.
For example, the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 permitted heterosexual marriage in churches - thus reversing the teaching of St Augustine. This allowed the parish churches and cathedrals to impose charges for the wedding and related services, which previously had been held (if at all) outside the church. This same Council promulgated the incredible doctrine of Transubstantiation and instituted the practice of Confession. The Second Lateran Council in 1139 (when the papacy and hierarchy were still relatively weak) had been much more concerned with behaviour, excommunicating jousters and urging the 'repression of marriage and concubinage among priests, deacons, subdeacons, monks, and nuns'. In this council also, the rising power of princes was reflected in Canon 20, wherein kings and princes were commanded to dispense justice in consultation with the bishops, whose power was growing more or less in step.
Loot from Constantinople and the many other places pillaged during the various Crusades (which were financed by merchants who expected a good return) also fuelled the new economy. Contacts with Arab and Muslim cultures brought new ideas - for example the quasi-Sufic/neo-Platonic idea of Chivalry, which was the direct opposite of the behaviour of the Crusader thugs and war-lords. The highly-sophisticated and tolerant culture of Moorish Spain, victim of the so-called shameless and terrible Reconquistà during the 12th century, provided new tools for scholarship and learning. The first universities were set up...and so on...
The first capitalist enterprise involving shareholders occurred also in the 12th century near Toulouse, when a group of merchants teamed up to build water-mills on the river Garonne, and distributed the resulting profits as interest on investment.
Avaritia and Luxuria quickly lost their status as the two most terrible sins. The brief experimental window of Christian community in the West, which was carried from Egypt via Spain (where it died out under the Vizigoths) to Ireland and thence eventually (with the travelling saints such as Columbanus, Gall, Fiacra etc.) to the Frankish kingdoms, ceased in the 12th century, when the Roman Church became married to wealth. The last pillar of Jesus' fragile teaching, which had been shakily re-erected for 600 years, was toppled. Eight hundred years later, wealth, luxury, vainglory and carnality are the cornerstones of our culture. Now, la luxure means 'lechery' (from lècher, to lick) in French - while 'luxury' is le luxe. The modern French word for Luxuria is la crapule.
(For more on the Egyptian Connection, click here.)
So the serious monks' minatory corbels became decorative heads and beasts, jokey/lampooning roof-bosses and gargoyles to amuse the merchants and bishops who were the economic and moral backbone of increasingly town-based religion.
Unlike the didactic and minatory Romanesque sculptures, roof-bosses and misericords are caprices and satires carved for a kind of freedom-zone within a church. The post-Romanesque sub-class of exhibitionists known (for peculiar historical reasons) as sheela-na-gigs ) are, however, desperately serious, as their hideous appearance and crude execution demonstrate. They are much more likely to have been placed on the walls of churches to acquire status rather than to 'paganise' or colonise Christianity with 'old magic'. In Ireland they moved onto castles, and, as their significance was lost they ended up on gateways all over Europe (e.g. Antwerp, Milan, Barcelona), then on town houses (e.g. Drogheda), and, at their last gasp, on the baroque handles of flintlock pistols. However, a few exhibitionist images of Satan can be found on or in Spanish Plateresque churches. (By the fifteenth century Satan was generally thought of as a king - the king of Hell - following 300 years of the rise, and rise, of monarchies.)
Whereas even the most rustic Romanesque images of carnality had a certain folksy charm,
Ithyphallic male as load-bearing corbel
the post-Romanesque images more resemble in their shrill insistence the mural paintings that appeared and disappeared in Belfast in recent years.
Two vulva-pulling exhibitionist females from county Cavan,
as displayed in the County Museum, Ballyjamesduff.
On the other pendentives are: a squatting, naked but not exhibitionist bearded male figure with arms raised; a naked non-exhibitionist male bending forward with his hands on his knees; and a bull's head.
Another female exhibitionist in the company of other sinners and of snakes can be seen on a remarkable rustic Romanesque font at Cleckheaton in Yorkshire.
At this point it is important to point out that concupiscentia (what we would now call 'sex') was not only the act of penetration act: all 'lewd' and lecherous behaviour, from frottage and inter-femoral/-crural to oral and anal sex were also condemned. For an insight into the Christian ascetic approach to sex, click here.
All the elements that were to be found in the thousands of Romanesque corbels can be found in the dozens of the post-Romanesque sheela-na-gig figures that survive - but disturbingly exaggerated: some dire message is being screamed out with neither wit nor art to help - but surely not a warning against the sins of the flesh ? And whereas there are more male than female Romanesque figures, males are extremely rare after the 12th century. Couples were not uncommon in the 11th and 12th centuries, but rare thereafter - the only example known to me being at Aldsworth in Gloucestershire. Acrobatic figures are also extremely rare, most Sheela-na-gigs being portrayed more or less the stance of the figures above - legs splayed and usually bent, feet out-turned and hands pulling enormous vulvas, often with labia and sometimes with clitoris shown. Several (such as Ballynahinch Castle, county Tipperary - one of a few showing its anus) look as if they are dancing. A few (mostly in Ireland) have one hand to their heads in a kind of salute, while the other passes above or beneath a thigh to pull or indicate the vulva, while the out-turned feet are at different heights, strangely reminiscent of oriental dance - in particular the images of the god Shiva dancing.
An Indian input into the phenomenon is, however, hardly likely. Although it has recently been shown by Mercia MacDermott in her book Explore Green Men that the motif of the "Green Man" came to Europe through trade with India, where they originated as kirttimukhas and makaras - motifs of mythical creatures some 2000 years old - and although it is well-established that Assyrian and Babylonian motifs came into Romanesque art via the Christian art of Armenia and Georgia, the female exhibitionist motif moved from the ancient West to the relatively modern East. H.D. Sankalia has shown that pre-Christian Baubo-figurines from Greece and Asia Minor became the headless, splay-legged, arm-raised Shameless Woman talismanic figures of Maharashhtra and Uttar Pradesh in the first centuries of the Christian Era.
Sheela-na-gigs themselves bear strong resemblance to the ancient Greek Baubos, as well as to the 8th century BC Kushite figurines of the dwarf-goddess Beset (who had an ithyphallic male consort, Bes) found in modern Sudan. Figurines of Baubo (and other 'un-Christian' themes such as lovers) seem to have been plentiful in France, for one is on display at the museum in Agen (Gers). Such figures were on-the-spot inspiration for Romanesque church-carvings of un-Christian types and behaviour.
photo by Julianna Lees
Foliate masks and "Green Men" are found all over Europe in both Romanesque and post-Romanesque contexts. There is even a Romanesque female almost-exhibitionist foliage-spewer on a nave-capital of the church at Melbourne in Derbyshire. Sheela-na-gigs, on the other hand, are found only in Britain and Ireland: so far, I have found just two sheela-figures (one doubtful) in France. Moreover, the famous South Asian female exhibitionist figures (such as in the Bhimsen Temple of Kathmandu, illustrated in Andersen's Witch on the Wall, 1977, page 132) date from the 17th century and are, with their feet-to-ears vulva-pulling posture, Hindu versions of Romanesque sculptures. Other figures illustrated by Sankalia are even more modern, more like sheela-na-gigs, and are even to this day being carved in Indonesia at least.
Long before that, however, squatting naked female figures featured in the Indus Valley civilisation of the second and third millennium BC, as shown by this small cylinder-seal featuring a ritual scene involving two sheep and another horned animal.
Tugford (Shropshire) photographed by John Harding.
And the 16th century figure on Ballinderry Castle (Galway) - otherwise crudely carved - has elaborate and asymmetric braids which recall the tresses and hair-styles of the Romanesque figures. A recently-discovered figure from Rahara Church has symmetrical ones, likewise beautifully carved, and - uniquely - good enough to be Romanesque.
Rahara (Roscommon) photographed by Gabriel Cannon.
of PHOTOGRAPHS of MALE and FEMALE EXHIBITIONISTS